16Hit1600
Craft and StructureVery hardTwo views on a scientist's priority

Craft and Structure practice question

Text 1 The discovery belongs to Voss, whose paper of March 1888 describes the effect fully; Halden's paper appeared in June. Text 2 Halden's paper appeared in June, but the journal's records show it was submitted in January, two months before Voss's, and held back by a slow referee. Priority of publication is not priority of discovery.

How would the author of Text 2 most likely respond to Text 1's claim?

  1. A. By arguing that the dates of publication mislead, since Halden's paper was written and submitted before Voss's.Correct
  2. B. By agreeing that Voss made the discovery.
  3. C. By denying that Voss published a paper in March.
  4. D. By claiming that neither scientist made the discovery.

Answer: A. By arguing that the dates of publication mislead, since Halden's paper was written and submitted before Voss's.

Submitted in January, published in June.

Why the other answers are wrong

B. By agreeing that Voss made the discovery.
Text 2 favours Halden.
C. By denying that Voss published a paper in March.
Text 2 accepts the March paper.
D. By claiming that neither scientist made the discovery.
No such claim.

More Craft and Structure questions

Not affiliated with the College Board. SAT is a trademark of the College Board.