16Hit1600
Craft and StructureVery hardTwo views on a battle's outcome

Craft and Structure practice question

Text 1 The army lost the battle because its commander delayed the attack until afternoon, giving the enemy time to dig in. Text 2 The attack was delayed until afternoon because the army's guns, sent by a road that had washed out, did not arrive until noon. A morning attack without guns would have been slaughter. The delay was the commander's best decision of the day, not his worst.

How would the author of Text 2 most likely respond to Text 1's judgement of the commander?

  1. A. By arguing that the delay was forced by the late arrival of the guns and was the right choice in the circumstances.Correct
  2. B. By agreeing that the commander should have attacked in the morning.
  3. C. By denying that the attack was delayed.
  4. D. By claiming the army won the battle.

Answer: A. By arguing that the delay was forced by the late arrival of the guns and was the right choice in the circumstances.

No guns until noon.

Why the other answers are wrong

B. By agreeing that the commander should have attacked in the morning.
Text 2 calls a morning attack slaughter.
C. By denying that the attack was delayed.
Text 2 explains the delay.
D. By claiming the army won the battle.
The outcome is not disputed.

More Craft and Structure questions

Not affiliated with the College Board. SAT is a trademark of the College Board.