16Hit1600
Craft and StructureHardAgreement on cost, disagreement on action

Craft and Structure practice question

Text 1 An engineer argues that the old railway viaduct should be demolished, because repairing it would cost more than building a new bridge. Text 2 A conservation officer argues that the viaduct should be kept for its historic value, but concedes that repairing it would indeed cost more than a new bridge.

Based on the texts, the engineer and the conservation officer would most likely agree with which statement?

  1. A. Repairing the viaduct would cost more than building a new bridge.Correct
  2. B. The viaduct should be demolished.
  3. C. The viaduct should be preserved for its historic value.
  4. D. Cost should play no part in the decision.

Answer: A. Repairing the viaduct would cost more than building a new bridge.

The engineer's premise is the cost comparison; the officer 'concedes' exactly that point.

Why the other answers are wrong

B. The viaduct should be demolished.
Only the engineer wants demolition.
C. The viaduct should be preserved for its historic value.
Only the officer argues for preservation.
D. Cost should play no part in the decision.
The engineer's whole argument rests on cost.

More Craft and Structure questions

Not affiliated with the College Board. SAT is a trademark of the College Board.