16Hit1600
Craft and StructureHardApplying a general principle to a specific claim

Craft and Structure practice question

Text 1 When an old building is found to contain a feature that seems too early for its date, historian Ines Baro warns, the usual explanation is reuse: builders routinely salvaged doors, beams, and carved stones from demolished structures. Text 2 The farmhouse is dated by its deeds to 1740, but its front door frame is carved in a style of about 1600, so the house must be a century older than the deeds suggest.

Based on the texts, how would Baro most likely respond to the reasoning in Text 2?

  1. A. By suggesting that the door frame was probably salvaged from an older building, so it does not date the house.Correct
  2. B. By agreeing that the house must date from 1600.
  3. C. By arguing that the deeds are forged.
  4. D. By claiming that door frames are never reused.

Answer: A. By suggesting that the door frame was probably salvaged from an older building, so it does not date the house.

An early feature in a later building: Baro's 'usual explanation' is reuse.

Why the other answers are wrong

B. By agreeing that the house must date from 1600.
Baro's principle argues against using the feature to redate the house.
C. By arguing that the deeds are forged.
Baro's point supports the deeds, not against them.
D. By claiming that door frames are never reused.
Baro says salvage was routine.

More Craft and Structure questions

Not affiliated with the College Board. SAT is a trademark of the College Board.