16Hit1600
Expression of IdeasVery hardRhetorical synthesis: forming a supported generalization from two cases

Expression of Ideas practice question

While researching a topic, a student has taken the following notes: • Archaeologists have long assumed that constructing monumental architecture requires the food surpluses generated by intensive agriculture. • Göbekli Tepe, in present-day Turkey: monumental stone enclosures erected around 9500 BCE. • The builders of Göbekli Tepe were foragers who had not adopted farming. • Caral, in present-day Peru: monumental platform mounds and sunken plazas built around 2600 BCE. • Caral's economy depended heavily on fishing and on cotton grown to make fishing nets rather than on intensive grain agriculture.

The student wants to make a generalization about the two sites in order to challenge a long-standing assumption. Which choice most effectively uses relevant information from the notes to accomplish this goal?

  1. A. Neither community depended on intensive agriculture—Göbekli Tepe's builders were foragers, and Caral's economy was centered on fishing—yet both raised monuments on an enormous scale, a pattern that undercuts the assumption that such projects require an agricultural surplus.Correct
  2. B. Göbekli Tepe, in present-day Turkey, consists of monumental stone enclosures erected around 9500 BCE by people who had not adopted farming.
  3. C. Göbekli Tepe and Caral, which were built roughly 7,000 years apart and on different continents, are both impressive examples of monumental architecture.
  4. D. Because monumental architecture appears at sites all over the world, archaeologists now agree that an agricultural surplus was never necessary for large-scale construction anywhere.

Answer: A. Neither community depended on intensive agriculture—Göbekli Tepe's builders were foragers, and Caral's economy was centered on fishing—yet both raised monuments on an enormous scale, a pattern that undercuts the assumption that such projects require an agricultural surplus.

The goal requires a claim that spans BOTH sites and bears on the stated assumption. Choice A identifies the shared feature (monument building without intensive agriculture) and links it to the assumption it undermines. (B) confines itself to a single site, so it offers no generalization at all — the error of selecting an accurate but unrepresentative detail. (C) does mention both sites, but the shared trait it names (both are monumental) is precisely what no one disputes; it omits the subsistence information that gives the comparison its force — the 'true but empty generalization' trap. (D) overreaches past the notes on two counts: it extends the conclusion to all sites worldwide and asserts a consensus among archaeologists that the notes never mention.

Why the other answers are wrong

B. Göbekli Tepe, in present-day Turkey, consists of monumental stone enclosures erected around 9500 BCE by people who had not adopted farming.
This is accurate, but it covers only Göbekli Tepe; the goal asks for a generalization spanning both sites, and one site can't establish a pattern.
C. Göbekli Tepe and Caral, which were built roughly 7,000 years apart and on different continents, are both impressive examples of monumental architecture.
You did include both sites, but the shared trait you named — that both are monumental — is exactly what no one disputes. The challenge to the assumption comes from the subsistence details (foraging, fishing), which this choice leaves out.
D. Because monumental architecture appears at sites all over the world, archaeologists now agree that an agricultural surplus was never necessary for large-scale construction anywhere.
This goes well beyond the notes on two counts: it extends the conclusion to all sites worldwide, and it claims archaeologists now agree, a consensus the notes never mention.

More Expression of Ideas questions

Not affiliated with the College Board. SAT is a trademark of the College Board.