16Hit1600
Information and IdeasVery hardDetail that distinguishes two explanations

Information and Ideas practice question

Two explanations have been offered for the abandonment of the hilltop settlement around 1200. The first blames a drought recorded in tree rings from the region; the second, a shift in trade routes that left the settlement isolated. The tree-ring drought, however, lasted only four years, and settlements nearby survived it. The trade-route shift is harder to date but fits the slow decline seen in the pottery.

According to the text, what weakens the drought explanation?

  1. A. The drought was brief, and nearby settlements survived it.Correct
  2. B. Tree rings cannot record droughts.
  3. C. The settlement was abandoned before the drought.
  4. D. The pottery shows a sudden collapse.

Answer: A. The drought was brief, and nearby settlements survived it.

Four years, and neighbours survived.

Why the other answers are wrong

B. Tree rings cannot record droughts.
The text accepts the tree-ring record.
C. The settlement was abandoned before the drought.
No such dating is given.
D. The pottery shows a sudden collapse.
The pottery shows a slow decline.

More Information and Ideas questions

Not affiliated with the College Board. SAT is a trademark of the College Board.