Information and IdeasVery hardDetail that distinguishes two explanations
Information and Ideas practice question
Two explanations have been offered for the abandonment of the hilltop settlement around 1200. The first blames a drought recorded in tree rings from the region; the second, a shift in trade routes that left the settlement isolated. The tree-ring drought, however, lasted only four years, and settlements nearby survived it. The trade-route shift is harder to date but fits the slow decline seen in the pottery.
According to the text, what weakens the drought explanation?
- A. The drought was brief, and nearby settlements survived it.Correct
- B. Tree rings cannot record droughts.
- C. The settlement was abandoned before the drought.
- D. The pottery shows a sudden collapse.
Answer: A. The drought was brief, and nearby settlements survived it.
Four years, and neighbours survived.
Why the other answers are wrong
- B. Tree rings cannot record droughts.
- The text accepts the tree-ring record.
- C. The settlement was abandoned before the drought.
- No such dating is given.
- D. The pottery shows a sudden collapse.
- The pottery shows a slow decline.
More Information and Ideas questions
- Very hard
Which choice best states the main idea of the text? - Very hard
Which choice best states the main idea of the text? - Very hard
Which choice best uses the data to support the claim that Coating B better resists rust? - Very hard
Which choice most logically completes the text with a conclusion the evidence supports? - Very hard
Which choice most logically completes the text? - Very hard
Which choice most logically completes the text?
Not affiliated with the College Board. SAT is a trademark of the College Board.