16Hit1600
Problem-Solving and Data AnalysisVery hardOverstating certainty from a poll

Problem-Solving and Data Analysis practice question

A poll of 1,000 randomly selected adults found that 62% oppose a policy, with a margin of error of 3 percentage points. A headline reads: 'Nearly two-thirds of the country oppose the policy — the result is beyond doubt.' Which criticism of the headline is most valid?

  1. A. The result is well supported, but 'beyond doubt' overstates it: the true percentage could plausibly be anywhere from 59% to 65%.Correct
  2. B. A sample of 1,000 people is far too small to say anything about a whole country.
  3. C. The poll should have surveyed every adult in the country.
  4. D. Random selection of respondents makes the result invalid.

Answer: A. The result is well supported, but 'beyond doubt' overstates it: the true percentage could plausibly be anywhere from 59% to 65%.

A random sample supports an estimate with a margin of error, never certainty. The headline's 'beyond doubt' ignores the ±3 points.

Why the other answers are wrong

B. A sample of 1,000 people is far too small to say anything about a whole country.
1,000 randomly selected people give a margin of about 3 points, which is quite precise.
C. The poll should have surveyed every adult in the country.
Surveying everyone is neither necessary nor practical; sampling works, within its margin.
D. Random selection of respondents makes the result invalid.
Random selection is what makes the result VALID for the population.

More Problem-Solving and Data Analysis questions

Not affiliated with the College Board. SAT is a trademark of the College Board.