16Hit1600
Problem-Solving and Data AnalysisVery hardConfounding in a comparison of two groups

Problem-Solving and Data Analysis practice question

Pupils who chose to attend an optional after-school maths club scored higher on average on the end-of-year exam than pupils who did not attend. A teacher concludes that the club causes higher scores. Which of the following is the strongest reason the conclusion is not justified?

  1. A. Pupils chose whether to attend, so those who were already stronger or more motivated in maths may have been more likely to join.Correct
  2. B. The exam was taken at the end of the year rather than the start.
  3. C. The club met after school rather than during the school day.
  4. D. The average score was used instead of the median.

Answer: A. Pupils chose whether to attend, so those who were already stronger or more motivated in maths may have been more likely to join.

Self-selection means attendance is confounded with prior ability and motivation; only random assignment would support a causal claim.

Why the other answers are wrong

B. The exam was taken at the end of the year rather than the start.
Timing of the exam does not create the confounding.
C. The club met after school rather than during the school day.
When the club met is irrelevant to the inference.
D. The average score was used instead of the median.
The choice of average does not address causation.

More Problem-Solving and Data Analysis questions

Not affiliated with the College Board. SAT is a trademark of the College Board.