16Hit1600
Problem-Solving and Data AnalysisVery hardRandom selection and random assignment together

Problem-Solving and Data Analysis practice question

Researchers selected 400 students at random from all students enrolled at one university and randomly assigned each of them to take notes either by hand or on a laptop during the same series of lectures. Students who took notes by hand scored significantly higher on a later comprehension test.

Which conclusion is best supported?

  1. A. For students at that university, taking notes by hand caused the higher comprehension scores.Correct
  2. B. For students at universities generally, taking notes by hand causes higher comprehension scores.
  3. C. Among students at that university, note-taking method and comprehension are associated, but no causal conclusion is possible.
  4. D. No conclusion is possible, because the study involved only one university.

Answer: A. For students at that university, taking notes by hand caused the higher comprehension scores.

This study has both features, and each buys something different. Random ASSIGNMENT to the two methods supports a causal conclusion; random SELECTION from that university's students supports generalising to that university. Together they give a causal claim about students at that university.

Why the other answers are wrong

B. For students at universities generally, taking notes by hand causes higher comprehension scores.
The random selection drew only from one university's students, so the generalisation stops there. Students elsewhere had no chance of being selected and may differ.
C. Among students at that university, note-taking method and comprehension are associated, but no causal conclusion is possible.
Random assignment is present, and that is precisely what licenses a causal conclusion. This answer applies the caution appropriate to an observational study to an experiment.
D. No conclusion is possible, because the study involved only one university.
One university limits how far the result generalises, but it doesn't void the study. Within that university the design supports a strong causal conclusion.

More Problem-Solving and Data Analysis questions

Not affiliated with the College Board. SAT is a trademark of the College Board.