16Hit1600
Expression of IdeasVery hardRecommendation weighing cost against time

Expression of Ideas practice question

While researching a topic, a student has taken the following notes: - A café must choose between two coffee roasters. - Roaster A costs $2,000, roasts 5 kg an hour, and needs replacing every 3 years. - Roaster B costs $9,000, roasts 20 kg an hour, and lasts about 12 years. - The café roasts 30 kg of coffee a day.

The student wants to make a recommendation and support it with information from the notes. Which choice most effectively uses relevant information from the notes to accomplish this goal?

  1. A. The café should buy roaster B: over twelve years it costs only $1,000 more than buying roaster A four times, and it roasts the day's 30 kg in an hour and a half instead of six hours.Correct
  2. B. Roaster A costs $2,000.
  3. C. The café should buy roaster A, because $2,000 is far less than $9,000.
  4. D. The café should buy both roasters and run them together.

Answer: A. The café should buy roaster B: over twelve years it costs only $1,000 more than buying roaster A four times, and it roasts the day's 30 kg in an hour and a half instead of six hours.

A recommendation supported by the lifetime cost (4 × $2,000 = $8,000 against $9,000) and the daily roasting time (30/5 = 6 hours against 30/20 = 1.5).

Why the other answers are wrong

B. Roaster A costs $2,000.
A figure, no recommendation.
C. The café should buy roaster A, because $2,000 is far less than $9,000.
This compares only the up-front prices, ignoring that roaster A must be bought four times and takes four times as long.
D. The café should buy both roasters and run them together.
Nothing in the notes supports buying both.

More Expression of Ideas questions

Not affiliated with the College Board. SAT is a trademark of the College Board.