16Hit1600
Information and IdeasHardCommand of textual evidence

Information and Ideas practice question

A historian claims that the ancient city's wealth came chiefly from its position on trade routes rather than from local farming.

Which finding would best support the historian's claim?

  1. A. Excavated warehouses were filled with goods manufactured hundreds of miles away.Correct
  2. B. The surrounding soil was fertile enough to grow grain.
  3. C. The city's population grew steadily for two centuries.
  4. D. Many residents kept small gardens within the city walls.

Answer: A. Excavated warehouses were filled with goods manufactured hundreds of miles away.

The claim is that wealth came from trade rather than local farming, so warehouses stocked with distant goods point to trade as the source (A). B and D actually suggest local food production, working against the claim, and C shows growth without identifying its cause.

Why the other answers are wrong

B. The surrounding soil was fertile enough to grow grain.
Fertile soil points to local farming as a wealth source, which is the explanation the historian is arguing against, so this weakens rather than supports the claim.
C. The city's population grew steadily for two centuries.
Steady population growth shows the city thrived but names no cause, so it can't distinguish trade from farming.
D. Many residents kept small gardens within the city walls.
Gardens inside the walls are evidence of local food production — the alternative the historian rejects — so this works against the claim.

More Information and Ideas questions

Not affiliated with the College Board. SAT is a trademark of the College Board.